Debian assumes that you understand this procedure, while Linux Mint explains it in detail. To download either distribution, you need to download an installation image and transfer it to an optical or flash drive. However, since these are the most popular hardware platforms, for most people, this limitation is not a problem. In comparison, Mint is developed by dozens, and is available only on 32 and 64 bit Intel hardware, and, more recently, a version to install on Windows. It can afford this broad level of support because Debian contributors number in the hundreds, including over a thousand certified package maintainers. In its efforts to be all things to all people, Debian supports 10 official hardware architectures. Installation, desktop environments, administration and package management all combine to make using Linux Mint a different experience from booting up Debian. However, these statements give only the broadest overviews of the differences between the two distributions. Its About page summarizes this focus by stating that “The purpose of Linux Mint is to produce a modern, elegant and comfortable operating system which is both powerful and easy to use.” Today, Debian’s home page labels it “the universal operating system,” hinting at its efforts to support as many different types of hardware and levels of user as possible.īy contrast, Linux Mint is intended more at new users. ![]() Increasingly, this reputation is undeserved - at least if you can follow instructions during installation. However, although both have a similar record for stability and software choice, small differences between the two may make you prefer one over the other.īecause of its history, Debian has a reputation for being an expert’s distribution. Since 2015, Mint and Debian have had the largest number of page hits on Distrowatch, with Ubuntu closely behind them. I have no clue as to what "shareit" "uc browser" or "appvn" are about, I have never heard of them in linux.Linux Mint is an independent distribution, but it continues to have close links with Debian. It is not the end of the world to stay a few more months in Mint and learn. You could always wait till July/August for the new stable also. And if you look, you can also find the non-free isos of Debian, they are not as hidden away as they used to be. If you are new, try Sparky4 with a live usb. Wifi There should not be much difference between Sparky and mint, both automatically give you non-free early in the install. The older the computer, the more likely the non-free drivers will work if needed. Wifi There are some fairly new Broadcomms that will involve work in any linux distribution. If you are on Mint based on 2018, it is not the end of the world. Now in the usOfa I curse the xorg/synaptic ancient crap on Mint from 2017 on the laptops at work (US agency out of Omaha), IT has not gone to systemd libinjput 2018 version of mint. I was looking at Mint hard in 2014-15 to see if I could get in put onto ancient computers in a day program(at work in Winnipeg) instead of WinXP. but the environment and landscape still continue to diverge. Yes, much common ground is taken up each 6 months when Ubuntu helps itself to Debian testing. But 15 years into a fork can mean a large amount of distance when you look at vectors. This probably is just a reflection of the times (I'm told forums are old hat and people want social media). ![]() The only thing I don't like (so far) with Sparky is the activity (or lack) that I see on the forums. I've ran it for more than a year and am impressed, it's a 'it just works' distro as long as you don't play with it too much (and thus break it). If it weren't for what was listed above, Solus would be my choice. Much of that work has been done in Sparky for us. As a general rule, different desktops conflict and require a fair amount of tweaking to get right (and even then it seems there are compromises). I've decided I love the freedom of easily switching between multiple desktop environments that Sparky offers, this is (in my experience) unique among distros. Others, like Arch based, or RedHat, or Suse, just aren't quite my cup of tea, though I've tried many of them (I currently have 7 distros installed on my hard drives, because I was evaluating for a 'class' presentation). Underneath they're the same, but there may be some seasoning applied on top (and philosophy of rolling/stable/etc). ![]() This does lend itself to a lot of feedback and fixes coming out faster sometimes. It's not necessarily the best, most recent, most secure, most stable, but it's the largest population. Personally, I prefer Debian based because basically every application is supported here, because Ubuntu is the largest install base of Desktop Linux. Mint/Sparky/Ubuntu (and many others) are all Debian based.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |